Only 3 percent of the more than 1,000 tax recommendations made by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to governments in recent years focus on taxing wealth and income from wealth, new analysis by Oxfam reveals ahead of the IMF and World Bank Spring Meetings in Washington, D.C.
Oxfam examined the IMF’s tax advice to 125 countries between 2022 and 2024. Despite the rapid growth of extreme wealth ―billionaire wealth has surged by 81 percent since 2020― just 30 of 1,049 tax recommendations focus on net wealth taxes and the taxation of income from wealth, namely capital gains.
“As billionaire fortunes grow at extraordinary speed, the IMF’s silence on taxing extreme wealth is increasingly untenable,” said Kate Donald, Head of Oxfam International’s Washington DC Office. “The Fund is reinforcing a system in which ordinary people —already strangled by rising prices— are forced to shoulder the brunt of taxes. Meanwhile, vast concentrations of obscene wealth remain largely untaxed. Serious fiscal reform should start with those most able to contribute.”
Oxfam’s analysis exposes two striking discrepancies in IMF guidance depending on a country’s income level.
First, 52 percent of tax advice to high-income countries was progressive, while 59 percent of tax advice to low- and lower-middle-income countries was regressive. A progressive tax system ensures those who have higher income and more wealth pay more taxes than those who have less. Progressive tax measures like net wealth and capital gains taxes were rarely recommended, and when they were, advice was concentrated in high-income contexts.
- IMF tax advice to Canada and the United States was overwhelmingly progressive, while advice to South Asia was by far the most regressive, followed by Latin America and the Caribbean, and sub-Saharan Africa. India received the highest number of regressive recommendations.
- In the past 25 years, the gap between the richest 1 percent and the poorest 50 percent has grown in twice as many low- and middle-income countries that received mostly regressive IMF tax advice (25 percent) than in those that received mostly progressive advice (11 percent).
Second, while the IMF publicly acknowledges that tax policy is a critical tool for addressing inequality, it links its tax advice to inequality far more often for high-income countries (34 percent) than low- and lower-middle-income countries (8 percent). Nearly 90 percent of low- and lower-middle-income countries have medium or high inequality.
- Kenya, where the richest 1% own 78% of the country’s total financial wealth while nearly half of the population live in extreme poverty, was advised in 2024 to raise new levies on basic commodities like bread, sugar and cooking oil in order to safeguard debt sustainability. Public anger led to massive protests resulting in the killing of many protesters.
- Nigeria, where nearly one-third of the population lives in poverty —the highest rate in Africa—was advised to increase value-added taxes, which disproportionately affect the poor.
"The IMF is operating with a troubling double standard that calls into question the evenhandedness it holds as a core principle. It offers mostly progressive tax advice to rich countries, yet its guidance for the rest of the world remains largely regressive. The Fund must provide equally progressive tax advice to all members —or admit its commitment to tackling inequality is merely rhetorical," said Donald.
Oxfam’s analysis also found that 10 percent of the IMF’s recommended tax reforms address gender inequality, and most of these references amount to just a few sentences. Overall, more than 90 percent of all IMF tax guidance focuses on tweaking existing measures.
The IMF’s guidance on taxation, particularly windfall profits taxes, is critical amid the unlawful attacks by Israel and the United States, and Iran's response, which are causing widespread human suffering in the Middle East. Surging energy prices are driving up the cost of transport, food, and other basic commodities, disproportionately affecting low-income households and deepening existing inequalities. Oxfam estimates that 45 energy corporations made on average $237 billion per year in windfall profits in 2021 and 2022, due largely to energy price shocks linked to the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Since March 2026, the world's largest oil majors have seen a boost in share prices, partly reflecting expectations of further windfall gains.
Oxfam urges the IMF to seize the opportunity presented by its ongoing comprehensive review to fundamentally reform how tax policy is integrated into its economic surveillance. Specifically, the IMF must:
- Systematically place inequality at the heart of all fiscal advice, defaulting to revenue-raising policies that enhance the progressivity of national tax systems. Discourage over-reliance on consumption taxes and other regressive measures that disproportionately burden low-income households.
- Conduct and publish rigorous distributional impact assessments of all tax and fiscal advice included in Article IV reports to ensure recommendations do not exacerbate inequality.
- Significantly broaden recommendations for taxing high-net-worth individuals and wealth, while actively supporting measures to curb corporate tax avoidance and harmful competition.
- Develop a centralized, user-friendly database to track and publicize the tax advice provided in Article IV reports.
Simon Trépanier | simon.trepanier@oxfam.org | +39 388 850 9970
For real-time updates, follow us on X , and Bluesky, and join our WhatsApp channel tailored specifically for journalists and media professionals.
Oxfam examined the IMF's tax advice to 125 countries between 2022 and 2024, drawing on a novel dataset of 1,049 recommendations extracted from Article IV reports. Download Oxfam’s report “Time to Walk the Talk: The IMF’s Advice 2022-2024" and methodology note.
Billionaire wealth has surged by 81 percent since 2020. This comes as one in four people don’t regularly have enough to eat and nearly half the world’s population live in poverty.
Data on inequality is from the World Bank’s Poverty and Inequality Platform. A Gini coefficient greater than 0.4 indicates a high level of income inequality, while a value of 0.3 or higher signifies medium income inequality.